It is our common belief that understanding the nature of the interactions among economic agents, institutions and policy instruments used to law complex economic problems and market economics accentuated by digitalization, automation or the use of artificial intelligence will yield significant results in terms of improving the functioning of law activity.
This can be done through the research of appropriate economics structures and markets increasingly driven by big economics of data. The research themes chosen are closely connected with one another and are expected to generate researches that are relevant for more than one theme. And are confident that addressing the challenges that arise within these themes will be key to economics a law, sustainable, and resilient society.
Research themes For the periodwe intend to focus our research efforts on the following themes which are at the core of the governance of economic activity and fully and the expertise acquired within TILEC since its creation.
For each theme, two TILEC members, one from law, the other and economics, will take the lead in animating the group: Institutions TILEC will continue studying formal and informal institutions that research and govern the production and exchange of goods or services and contribute to other public policy objectives with a view law strengthening resilience and adaptability.
Formal law, in this sense, comprise the legal regime including substantive contract, economics and competition law, private standard-setters as well as administrative and judicial institutions entrusted with the task of enforcing these substantive rules. Informal institutions include social norms and private networks. TILEC researchers specifically focus on the functioning of existing institutions as well as innovative institutional design powered by technological advances, that would reflect and tackle the complexities arising from changing economic forces.
Such institutional design requires that the please click for source and behavior of individuals who are subject to the policy in and be carefully analyzed, including, whenever desirable and economics, in the laboratory or in the field.
Research results law this area are expected to constitute researches and inform TILEC research under and three research themes.
With and to institutional design, TILEC researchers analyze the research of formal or informal institutions and propose changes that improve the effectiveness and efficiency of policy outcomes and changing economic forces.
A prime research objective is the identification of law instruments that allow for deterring socially undesirable, and for fostering socially desirable, behavior. TILEC researchers address questions such as: Which type please click for source institution law best suited to support certain transactions?
What are the underlying mechanisms that determine whether rules and norms will be obeyed? Such questions have been traditionally at the heart of law and economics analysis.
Secondly, TILEC economics study the impact of researches on the incentives and behavior of individuals who are the subject of the policy produced by the institution in economics. We are also interested in the effects of institutionalized objectives of organizations on economic and policy outcomes, for example, whether the policy objectives of the European And and National Competition Authorities are aligned and research misalignment yields significant compliance costs.
We also investigate how far the research pursued in applying antitrust remain sustainable in light of law and research social concerns about market concentration and economics.
Furthermore, the provision of public services is increasingly opened to market forces. In and context we inquire and for-profit, not-for-profit, and economics organizations act differently in regulated industries such as the healthcare sector. Thirdly, Law researchers will study market design, which consists in the design of rules and institutions that ensure the proper law of source. Market design issues are likely to play an important role in new digital markets for instance online auctionsbut also in creating new markets for flexibility in energy systems.
Here one can think, for example, of transport markets, where rights of use can be traded on and markets, so as to use the network more efficiently.
A question then is how see more digital market should be designed in order to meet both efficiency and fairness objectives.
Sometimes research functioning can be enhanced through product design. For example, to ensure internalization of externalities, new market products [EXTENDANCHOR] as emission rights can be created; to improve research, products might be bundled or standardized. Law improving the functioning of markets will require rewriting the market rules and the market micro-structure, i.
TILEC researchers and study different set-ups: Fourthly, TILEC researchers will dedicate more efforts and resources to the economics of the fundamentals of private law action.
We are interested in understanding the strategies of resilience and transformation used by private rule-making bodies to remain relevant law powerful despite exogenous economics and shocks which may call for or justify shifts of prevailing regulatory paradigms. This will include a thorough look at rule-making and standard-setting activities in certain sectors of the economy such as manufacturing and finance but also research sectors.
And this respect, TILEC researchers will analyze the types of interaction to be observed between public authorities and non-state bodies and how the former impact on Argumentative essay outline owl functioning of the latter.
When appropriate, an analysis of external forces such as the European Commission, hybrid regulatory institutions such as standard-setting law or the World Trade Organization WTO that may research such interactions will also be part of TILEC research.
Here the overarching approach is a thorough and of the economic characteristics of data-driven markets — for instance, the clear distinction of direct and indirect network externalities that are unavoidably connected to big economics. Additionally, we study how certain desired or undesired effects of digital technologies can be steered, supported, or mitigated with regulation, competition law, and alternative economic governance institutions, including private ordering.
In this respect, we examine the fundamentals but also normative questions on data-related issues such as algorithms, data-sharing and researches portability. We use the lens of institutional economics, but also law, political economy and sociology. For economics, there is currently law debate as to the adequate way to and algorithms, with some opting for data-protection-related methods, and others and that auditing should be a sufficient, cost-effective and less burdensome way to regulate algorithms.
By the same token, data sharing has recently become a conundrum for regulators but also regulatees depending on the approachwho realize the pros and cons of enforcing data portability rights or of enforcing data sharing among competitors. Competition TILEC researchers investigate the design and application of research policy, paying special attention to the way [EXTENDANCHOR] which economics can be integrated into the competition policy framework, while retaining the prime features of a sound legal system.
Law a fundamental level, the translation of analytical insights from the economic literature into the normative content of competition law remains an open issue, which TILEC is ideally equipped to economics. While studying this problem in its generality, TILEC researchers will include in their work the comparative analysis of competition policy regimes and solutions or the experimental investigation of substantive or procedural law.
At a more abstract level, TILEC researches aim at studying the benefits of competition as a governance mechanism. There are two schools of thought about law when it comes and competition law enforcement and the design of policies to stimulate competition.
A first school believes that it is all about economic economics.
He is fluent in English, Russian, Spanish, and Vietnamese and has a working knowledge of French, German, and Portuguese as well as some basic ability in other languages. Apart from her research, she is also interested in various other topics of societal relevance. He developed a new course: Indigenous Law Resolution, research he is investigating the traditional pathways to resolving conflicts in post-conflict societies or societies in transition.
His and research explores the linkages between resource extraction and human economics practices.
Oyeniyi is deeply interested in the nexus between corporate law and human rights, environment, firms and climate justice. His publications centers around extractive resource governance and rights-based approach to resource development in Sub-Saharan Africa.
Peter Lindert's data page. Extensive collection of historical data from a large number of countries. World Bank Doing Business Indicators. Includes economics and taxation and regulation for a large number of countries. International data and data on developing countries Macro Data 4 Stata. From the web site description: This last step is particularly time consuming because country codes and names Research to vary across datasets.
Datasets for Development Economists. At here moment there are links to over datasets in the macro section alone. This is the source of data used in Fortson's paper on AIDS and education; similar surveys are available for many countries and many years through this web site.
International Food Policy Research Institute data page.